You are care about Bruno Fernandes, today Celebrity-Network.net will share with you video about Bruno Fernandes was compiled and edited by our team from Youtube Chanel. Hope this video on the topic Referee explains why Bruno Fernandes goal vs Man City was not offside is useful to you.
Referee explains why Bruno Fernandes goal vs Man City was not offside
Question about Referee explains why Bruno Fernandes goal vs Man City was not offside
If you have any questions about Referee explains why Bruno Fernandes goal vs Man City was not offside, please let us know, all your questions or suggestions will help us improve in the following articles!
The article Referee explains why Bruno Fernandes goal vs Man City was not offside was compiled by me and my team from many sources. If you find the article Referee explains why Bruno Fernandes goal vs Man City was not offside helpful to you, please support the team Like or Share!
Rate Articles Referee explains why Bruno Fernandes goal vs Man City was not offside
Rate: 4-5 stars
Ratings: 5.00 star
Search keywords Referee explains why Bruno Fernandes goal vs Man City was not offside
Referee explains why Bruno Fernandes goal vs Man City was not offside, Bruno Fernandes, #Referee #explains #Bruno #Fernandes #goal #Man #City #offside
Source: United 07
This Post Has 20 Comments
offside is offside, dont explaint, if Rashford not there, it difference – dont try use video with remove effect to remove Rashford, that COMPLETE DIFFERENCE
SHIELDING the BALL from every ANGLE is also NOT TOUCHING the ball at all !
As always, referee LOVE MANURE !
The WORST refereeing by English Referee,
ALWAYS ADVANTAGE for MANURE since Alex Drunken Fergusan time !
If you want to know what the true definition of NOT INTEFERING of play means,
see latest video Celta Vigo 1 Athletic club 0.
That is the TRUEST DEFINITION of ALL !
He INSTANTLY stop play and even ducked himself fully to the ground !
Even if you argue that its not offside, Rashfords deliberate movements defiinitely affected, ,and influenced, the play of both City players AND United players …… the goal clearly should NOT have stood.
Wow thanks for defending our striker
Shut up its OFFSIDE and u know it
the screenshot which Rashford removed, shows Akanji is closer. However, if you see the video, the ball moved past Akanji in a speed towards Bruno, that Akanji/Walker won't be able to reach before Fernandes. So, it is clear that no interference from Rashford.
And the ultimate conclusion is that if you are a professional player, you should know that you have to play to the whistle. Go and chase the ball, tackle Bruno and Rashford, as there is no whistle. As simple as that.
Can you really be serious with such an interpretation. And don't give the video such a title to falsely induce people to watch this empty analysis
Stop using that picture 🤣 its not the same for f sake rashford run with the ball till bruno gets it offside clear offside tbh united just got lucky with that stupid decision
Play by the whistle, is that simple, failure to do so u have yourself to blame
Its not offside but the rules is fricking bullshit. They should just change tbh
Rashford interfered with play ! The end !
No goal. How can it be ?????🤷🏼♂️
Spawny Scum as usual.
Only talking about a player touching the ball but the part also talks about an attacker interfering with an opponent which was clearly indicated by Rushford blocking Akanji from the ball and also interfering to be sincere it was really an offside offence and we all know as humans we make mistakes especially referees which has ever happened in some matches all in all we hope that such shouldn't happen again
This is nonsense
We have seen a situation where the linesman don't even allow the player to run talkless of leaving the ball for another player, rashford was offside it doesn't matter maybe he torched the ball or not ,he didn't torch the ball but he was chasing the ball,
We have seen many occasions where referee didn't allow player to start running after the ball maybe he will torch it or not they quickly call it off, rashford was playing it doesn't matter maybe he torch it or not
They did this for Arsenal not man u
Man u should prepare for thier cake against Arsenal ,
I see premier League this season even if Arsenal need 100 goals in a match to get the league, EPL will probably give it to them in that single game
Ref don't know the rules
You are a fraud my friend 🤣
He was offside period he made a football move off and on the ball… Even tho he never touched it… He made a body faint like he was going to kick,control, or contact the ball… For that he's offside
This analysis is not correct. Rashford distracted/slowed the defenders and this goal would not have occurred if he was not there.
FIFA rules state that this should have been an offside.
If Rashford was in the example showed, then yes the goal should be allowed because he is not interfering with play
Unfortunately, the Referee was wrong. And you are cherry-picked from one part of the rulebook.
A player in an offside position is only penalised if, at the moment the ball touches or is played by one of his team, he is, in the opinion of the referee, involved in active play by: • interfering with play; or • interfering with an opponent; or • gaining an advantage by being in that position.
Rashford started in an offside position and influenced the play. Except that the Ref''s opinion was wrong. It happens. Way to often.
Akanji and goalkeeper knows rashford is offside they will know that if rashford tips or scored than its diffinatethey will know goal will be disallowed they should watch Bruno wasn't offside
Comments are closed.